Introduction to the Model Evaluation Framework
Our community provides two mainstream model evaluation frameworks, lm-evaluation-harness and OpenCompass, which have their own characteristics and application scenarios.
lm-evaluation-harness
- Overview
- This is a Python tool developed by EleutherAI designed to evaluate language models in a consistent way.
- It can handle various tasks, including language modeling, zero-shot, and few-shot tasks.
- Features
- Flexibility: It works with different models, including those from Hugging Face and OpenAI.
- Variety of Tasks: It covers many NLP tasks like text generation, cloze tests, question answering, and translation.
- Standardized Evaluation: It provides a fair way to compare the performance of different models using a uniform interface.
- Supported Models
- Models from the Hugging Face Transformers library such as GPT-2, GPT-3, T5, and BERT.
- OpenAI's API models (like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4).
- Custom models (where users need to provide a suitable API interface or loading logic).
- Best Use Cases
- Evaluating language models in research projects.
- Comparing the performance of existing models, especially in studies involving LLMs.
OpenCompass
- Overview
- OpenCompass is an open-source framework aimed at evaluating the performance of both domestic and international large language models.
- It is maintained by local developers and the open-source community, with a focus on Chinese language tasks.
- Features
- Local Support: Especially good for tasks in Chinese NLP, with many benchmark datasets available (like CLUE).
- Compatibility: Works with Hugging Face models, open-source LLMs, and commercial models via APIs (like Baidu Wenxin and Alibaba Tongyi).
- Easy to Extend: Users can easily add their own tasks or datasets.
- Supported Models
- Hugging Face's Transformer models.
- Open-source LLMs such as ChatGLM, MOSS, LLaMA, and Falcon.
- Commercial models that offer APIs, including Baidu Wenxin, Alibaba Tongyi, and iFlytek Spark.
- Best Use Cases
- Evaluating tasks in Chinese (like text classification and question generation).
- Comparing how well different LLMs perform on Chinese language tasks.
Comparison
Feature | lm-evaluation-harness | OpenCompass |
---|---|---|
Task Scope | Global tasks (mainly in English) | Focused on Chinese tasks |
Model Support | Open-source models + API models | Open-source models + domestic commercial models |
Best Use Cases | Academic research, comparing mainly English models | Evaluating Chinese tasks, comparing domestic and international models |
Ease of Use | More suitable for technical users | User-friendly, quick to add local tasks |
How to Choose?
- If your evaluation tasks are mainly in English or you want to compare global LLMs, try lm-evaluation-harness.
- If your tasks are primarily in Chinese or involve local commercial models, consider using OpenCompass.
- You can also use both systems together to better cover the performance comparison needs across different languages and tasks.